EPO logo
EPO boards of appeal decisions
homepage => search & index => boards of appeal decisions
Search mask List of updates
Date of decision 17 February 2004
Case number J 0024/03 - 3.1.1
Application number -
IPC -
Proceedings Language EN
Title of the application Image processing apparatus
Applicant name N.N.
Opponent name -
Headnote
I. A time limit within the meaning of Article 122(1) EPC involves a period of a legally indicated length fixed for carrying out a particular procedural act.

II. In procedural law, the fact that a conditional act can only be accomplished before a particular set of circumstances foreseen by a legal provision occurs (condition), is conceptually different from a set period of time imposed for doing an act (time limit) because in the first case the duration of the period in which the act should be completed is determined by the occurrence of the condition itself, whereas in the second case it is pre-determined from the outset.

III. Rule 25(1) EPC does not impose any time limit for filing a divisional application but rather sets a condition namely that the earlier European patent application is pending. Therefore, no time limit within the meaning of Article 122 EPC is imposed by this rule.

Articles and Rules EPC . Art 122(1)
. R 25(1)
Keywords
Re-establishment of rights - concept of time limit
Cited Decisions J 0003/83
Catchwords:
-

get the full pdf
 

EPO Home Page | Recent updates | Request info | Send comments | Index
Patent information on the internet

Copyright © 1997-2004 European Patent Office . All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: EPO Mail Distribution