EPO logo
EPO boards of appeal decisions
homepage => search & index => boards of appeal decisions
Search mask List of updates
Date of decision 04 May 2005
Case number J 0018/04 - 3.1.1
Application number 03014103.0
IPC -
Proceedings Language EN
Title of the application Architecture for managing alerts
Applicant name MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Opponent name -
Headnote
I. Rule 25(1) EPC imposes a substantive requirement which must be fulfilled when a divisional application is filed. A Board has no power to excuse an applicant from complying with this substantive requirement

II. Time limits in the EPC have two conceptual elements: 1, a period of time determined in years, months or days, and 2, a relevant date, which serves as the starting date of the time limit, and from which the period of time is counted. Time restrictions imposed on applicants by the EPC, but not having these conceptual elements can not be regarded as time limits for the purposes of Article 122 EPC.

III. No substantive rights are established in a divisional application before the actual filing date of the divisional application. Substantive rights which were lost in the parent application can not be re- established in the divisional application by applying Article 122 EPC.

Articles and Rules EPC . Art 122
. Art 125
. Art 76(3)
. Art 76(1)
. Art 90(2)
. R 83
. R 25(1)
Keywords
Re-establishment of rights for filing a divisional application - (no)
Concept of time limit
Cited Decisions J 0003/83
J 0011/91
J 0016/91
J 0021/96
J 0010/01
J 0024/03
G 0010/92
G 0005/83
T 0389/86
T 0427/99
T 1177/00
Catchwords:
-

get the full pdf
 

EPO Home Page | Recent updates | Request info | Send comments | Index
Patent information on the internet

Copyright © 1997-2005 European Patent Office . All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: EPO Mail Distribution