EPO logo
EPO boards of appeal decisions
homepage => search & index => boards of appeal decisions
Search mask List of updates
Date of decision 15 December 1992
Case number T 0390/90 - 3.3.1
Application number 81306189.2
IPC D21H5/18
Proceedings Language EN
Title of the application Process for preparing and using a crystalline product
Applicant name Josep Maria Gussinyer, S.A.
Opponent name Conte, Pietro, avv.
Headnote
An intervention under Article 105 EPC during appeal proceedings is not permissible, but is limited to opposition proceedings; interpretation of G 7/91 and G 8/91 (OJ EPO 1993,346, 356), see also T 27/92 (Referral published in OJ EPO 1993 705, pending under Ref. No. G6/93).
Articles and Rules EPC . Art 54(1)
. Art 54(2)
. Art 56
. Art 105
. Art 106(1)
. Art 111(1)
. Art 112(1)(a)
. Art 114(1)
. R 66(1)
Keywords
Admissibility of intervention of an assumed infringer during appeal proceedings
Legal status of Boards of Appeal
Non- equivalence of appeal and opposition proceedings
Boards' freedom not to refer to Enlarged Board: procedural economy
Novelty (yes) - second document incorporated by reference into the primary document - no disclosure of a continuous process in the light of common general knowledge at the relevant publication date
Inventive step (yes) - onus of proof regarding disputed effects
Cited Decisions -
Catchwords:
-

get the full pdf
 

EPO Home Page | Recent updates | Request info | Send comments | Index
Patent information on the internet


Copyright © 1997-2000 European Patent Office . All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: EPO Mail Distribution