|
Date of decision
|
12 September 1995
|
|
|
Case number
|
T 0939/92
- 3.3.1
|
|
|
Application number
|
87303463.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of the application
|
Triazole herbicides
|
|
|
Applicant name
|
AgrEvo UK Limited
|
|
|
Headnote
1. If a claim concerns a group of chemical compounds per se, an
objection of lack of support by the description pursuant to
Article 84 EPC cannot properly be raised for the sole reason
that the description does not contain sufficient information in
order to make it credible that an alleged technical effect
(which is not, however, a part of the definition of the claimed
compounds) is obtained by all the compounds claimed (see
reasons 2.2.2).
2. The question as to whether or not such a technical effect
is achieved by all the chemical compounds covered by such a
claim may properly arise under Article 56 EPC, if this
technical effect turns out to be the sole reason for the
alleged inventiveness of these compounds (reasons 2.4 to 2.6).
|
|
|
Keywords
Clarity and support by the description (yes)
Inventive step (no)
Alleged effect not credible for all claimed alternatives
Solution to more general technical problem obvious
|
|
|
|
|