|
Date of decision
|
10 July 96
|
|
|
Case number
|
T 0873/94
- 3.4.1
|
|
|
Application number
|
89116770.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of the application
|
Semiconductor device
|
|
|
Applicant name
|
KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
|
|
|
Headnote
I. A divisional application has to comply with the requirements
of both Article 76(1) EPC and Article 123(2) EPC. Article 76(1)
EPC governs the filing of a divisional application and therefore
whether it is entitled to the filing date of the parent
application and has the same benefit of right to priority as the
parent application. Article 123(2) EPC governs amendments to the
divisional application subsequent to its filing.
II. Where a proposal for amendment of an application involves
the addition of a limiting feature to a claim, application of a
"novelty test" is not appropriate to determine whether or not
the amendment complies with Article 123(2) EPC, because as
explained in Decision G 1/93 (OJ EPO 1994, 541), "Whether or not
the adding of an undisclosed feature limiting the scope of
protection...would be contrary to the purpose of Article 123(2)
EPC...depends on the circumstances".
|
|
|
Keywords
Feature added to claim of divisional application
Amended claimed combination within protection claimed in parent
and divisional application as filed
Subject-matter extending beyond the content of the earlier and
divisional application as filed (no)
|
|
|
|
|