EPO logo
EPO boards of appeal decisions
homepage => search & index => boards of appeal decisions
Search mask List of updates
Date of decision 10 July 96
Case number T 0873/94 - 3.4.1
Application number 89116770.2
IPC H01L27/11
Proceedings Language EN
Title of the application Semiconductor device
Applicant name KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
Opponent name -
Headnote
I. A divisional application has to comply with the requirements of both Article 76(1) EPC and Article 123(2) EPC. Article 76(1) EPC governs the filing of a divisional application and therefore whether it is entitled to the filing date of the parent application and has the same benefit of right to priority as the parent application. Article 123(2) EPC governs amendments to the divisional application subsequent to its filing.

II. Where a proposal for amendment of an application involves the addition of a limiting feature to a claim, application of a "novelty test" is not appropriate to determine whether or not the amendment complies with Article 123(2) EPC, because as explained in Decision G 1/93 (OJ EPO 1994, 541), "Whether or not the adding of an undisclosed feature limiting the scope of protection...would be contrary to the purpose of Article 123(2) EPC...depends on the circumstances".

Articles and Rules EPC . Art 76(1)
. Art 123(2)
Keywords
Feature added to claim of divisional application
Amended claimed combination within protection claimed in parent and divisional application as filed
Subject-matter extending beyond the content of the earlier and divisional application as filed (no)
Cited Decisions G 0001/93
T 0514/88
T 0441/92
Catchwords:
-

get the full pdf
 

EPO Home Page | Recent updates | Request info | Send comments | Index
Patent information on the internet


Copyright © 1997-2000 European Patent Office . All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: EPO Mail Distribution