EPO logo
EPO boards of appeal decisions
homepage => search & index => boards of appeal decisions
Search mask List of updates
Date of decision 03 December 2002
Case number T 0966/99 - 3.2.6
Application number 92112711.4
IPC A61F13/15
Proceedings Language EN
Title of the application Clean dry facing needled composite
Applicant name McNEIL-PPC, INC.
Opponent name SCA MOLNLYCKE AB
Headnote
-
Articles and Rules EPC . Art 108
. Art 123(3)
. Art 54(2)
. Art 123(2)
. Art 56
. Art 112(1)(a)
. Art 113
. R 65
. R 76(1)
Keywords
Admissibility of the appeal (yes)
Admendments - admissible (yes)
Novelty (yes)
Inventive step (yes)
Request to include in the decision certain reasoning in respect of the non-allowability of a request withdrawn by the patentee - rejected
Request to include in the minutes of oral proceedings the statements made by the parties concerning the withdrawn request - rejected
Referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - rejected
Cited Decisions G 0009/92
G 0009/91
G 0001/97
G 0004/93
G 0004/95
T 0631/91
Catchwords:
Rule 66(2) EPC implies that a decision should be reasoned in so far as the issues to be decided are concerned. Therefore, if the patent proprietor withdraws a request for maintenance of the patent on the basis of a set of claims, there is no longer a procedural basis for the Board to include reasons in the decision concerning the withdrawn request (point 7.1).

Rule 76(1) EPC does not require the Board to include statements, which are no longer directly related to the requests on file, in the minutes of oral proceedings for the sole purpose of providing ammunition to the opponent in possible future infringement proceedings. The exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts for infringement proceedings pursuant to Article 64(3) EPC should not be prejudiced by opinions and interpretations submitted during the appeal proceedings when they no longer relate to the patent in the form in which it is upheld by the Board (point 7.2.3).

A common practice of drafting the minutes of oral proceedings based on Rule 76(1) EPC has been established by the Boards of appeal from which practice the minutes drawn up by the present Board do not deviate. The present situation therefore does not give rise to a question of non-uniform application of the law under Article 112(1)(a) EPC (point 7.3.1).


get the full pdf
 

EPO Home Page | Recent updates | Request info | Send comments | Index
Patent information on the internet

Copyright © 1997-2003 European Patent Office . All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: EPO Mail Distribution