Date of decision: 28 June 2007
Case number: G 0001/06 - -
Application number: 01128824.8
IPC class: G09G3/36
Proceedings language: EN
| Title of the application Liquid Crystal Device |
|
| Applicant name SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION |
|
| Opponent name - |
|
| Headnote In the case of a sequence of applications consisting of a root (originating) application followed by divisional applications, each divided from its predecessor, it is a necessary and sufficient condition for a divisional application of that sequence to comply with Article 76(1), second sentence, EPC that anything disclosed in that divisional application be directly and unambiguously derivable from what is disclosed in each of the preceding applications as filed. |
|
| Articles and rules EPC Art 54(3) EPC Art 75(2) EPC Art 76(1) EPC Art 76(2) EPC Art 76(3) EPC Art 77(5) EPC Art 82 EPC Art 96(2) EPC Art 97(1) EPC Art 100(c) EPC Art 102(3) EPC Art 112(1)a EPC Art 113(1) EPC Art 123(1) EPC Art 123(2) EPC Art 138(1)c EPC Art 138(2) EPC R 25(1) EPC R 25(2) EPC R 51(2) EPC R 86(3) EPC R 86(4) |
|
| Keywords Invalidity as a result of non-compliance with Article 76(1) EPC on filing a divisional application - no Amendment to conform with Article 76(1) EPC - allowable, even if at time of amendment earlier application no longer pending Content of a member of a sequence of divisional applications must be disclosed in each of the preceding applications in the sequence as filed. Claims of a member of a sequence of divisional applications need not be directed to subject matter within the scope of the claims of the preceding applications in the sequence as filed. | |
| Cited decisions G 0001/93 G 0004/98 J 0015/85 J 0002/01 T 0514/88 T 0527/88 T 0122/90 T 0860/90 T 0441/92 T 0873/94 T 0276/97 T 0904/97 T 1074/97 T 0555/00 T 0561/00 T 0743/00 T 1004/90 T 1158/01 T 0720/02 T 0797/02 T 0039/03 T 0090/03 T 0873/04 T 1040/04 T 1092/04 T 1409/05 Hydroacoustics Incorporated's Applications [1981] FSR 538 | |
| Catchwords - |